Skip to main content

Thank You 500,000 readers

Politics - Britain's imperial legacy and impact on BREXIT

The Brexit of Britain, which is one of those Great European Imperial Powers that once had an empire and therefore it has a historic tendency to think in an imperialist manner and with a superiority complex. 
by Alex Naughton, editing by Earl of Cruise
Brexit and Britain
One star left the European Union
Britain for example had a superiority complex over its colonies such as Africa, South East Asia and the Middle East and native peoples of Australia and New Zealand for example. However this perceived superiority is misguided and wrong. All peoples are equal and every perspective has their opinion and that is at the heart of free speech and our values.

Our traditional distrust of China in the West is also perhaps misguided and clouded by our imperial mindset and superiority complex. Many of the European powers and America had trading posts / colonies in China for many years but were thrown out after the Opium Wars. Some countries such as Britain retained some territory such as Hong Kong. But this historic trauma clouded their perception. Since the opening up of China in the 1970s, despite being called the Communist Party, they have been on a transition towards a Chinese version of Capitalism but without the adverse impacts of Western Capitalism. Their governance system remains very centralised and state orientated but this enables them to plan long term and transition their economy in a very managed way. So arguably their economy and outlook is more capitalist than you may first imagine. Perhaps the Communist Party is just a political party and so communist in name only. President Xi recently at the World Economic Forum surprisingly gave a speech promoting globalisation and capitalism calling on countries around the world to stand up to rising nationalism and protectionism. A major plank of China's economic policy is reaching out through its One Road One Belt policy to create a New Silk Road to Europe, South East Asia and Russia. Likewise they have set up various banking and financial institutions to support these strategic policies and they continue to invest heavily in infrastructure and other activities in many parts of the world including Africa and elsewhere. So they arguably are Global China. Yes there may be scope for tension with the USA and Japan over certain policy positions such as South China Sea and so on, but China is a growing economic, political and military power on the world stage so there may be benefits to keeping a more open mind on them.
The British Empire 1915 - Source: britishempire.co.uk

Indeed many of the problems today in the Middle East date back to the period of the First World War when the Ottoman Empire was collapsing (a protectorate of Britain) and was being carved up by Britain and France. 
The construction of the Hedsha Railway and the Bagdad Railway supported and financed by the Deutsches Kaiserreich and German Banks, and the financial support by the German gouvernment, was a threat to British interests in and with the Ottoman Empire.
by Earl Cruise
Sykes and Picot divided up the Middle East into British and French areas behind the backs of the Arabs. Through this the boundaries of the modern Middle East were created and all the modern day national flags were designed as well. It also promised Russia that it could give them Istanbul to maintain Russia's access to its naval bases in Crimea from the Mediterranean. While Britain's concern was to maintain the sea route to India via the Suez Canal and an overland route to India via Istanbul and Baghdad to Basra and then by sea through Persian Gulf. The French likewise wanted to protect their sea route to Indo China via Suez. Also another big factor was oil. The only international area on this map was Palestine. This was the first promise. The second was when Britain promised the Arab peoples a single nation covering the whole Middle East from modern Turkey south to modern Yemen. However all these promises were rescinded upon for the imperial interests of Britain and France. France got much of North Africa and Lebanon and Syria. Britain got the rest including Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Aden, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, Palestine, Iraq and Iran as "mandates" under agreement with the UN. Yet these were in effect colonies as Britain didn't feel that the Arab peoples were well trained enough to govern themselves yet (despite agreeing with their wish for independence) so felt the need to rule them as colonies for a period to teach them how to govern. In the 1920s Turkey rebelled against the European powers and Ataturk created the Republic of Turkey as a secular state thereby also shunning the Arabs as well. The third promise that Britain made under pressure from the Rothschild family was the Balfour Declaration which declared Britain's intent to support the formation of a Jewish state somewhere in the Middle East. This last promise was the only one implemented with the creation of Israel after the Second World War partly to give Britain's allies such as America and Russia something to gain from at the end of the Second World War thereby keeping them interested and involved in the war effort. 

These three "promises" especially the Sykes Picot Agreement are the root causes of the problems in the Middle East today. Imperial "superiority complexes" by Britain and France not willing to understand that the Arabs may know how to govern themselves or wish to have independence without being under their imperial rule. Also Britain then was driven by a strong imperial intent to maintain a sea route to India via the Suez Canal as well as an overland route to India via Istanbul, Baghdad and Basra then ship through Persian Gulf to India. This imperial legacy is also why Britain has long relationships with countries such as Egypt, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar and Saudi Arabia despite their authoritarian regimes. 

The imperial legacy of Britain also informs the underlying reasoning perhaps why BREXIT occurred and Britain's sometimes indecisive attitude towards the European Union. The British culture and history has ingrained in its people an imperial legacy including firstly a dislike of the word "Constitution" perhaps due to the historic trauma of America leaving the British Empire. This has led to an adverse reaction when the European Union suggested a written constitution and also perhaps is why Britain doesn't have a written constitution yet historically has written the basis to many constitutions for countries around the world! 

Secondly, in history Britain has been invaded from the European Continent including by the Vikings, Romans and Normans. This has ingrained a slight wariness towards the European Continent therefore informing perhaps out "in and out" relationship with the European Union. 

Also thirdly we have been very allergic to the idea of a federal superstate of the European Union perhaps due to the comparison with becoming the United States of America but instead a United States of Europe. Britain has been used to being an imperial power of its own so doesn't perhaps like becoming subsumed under a superstate of the European Union as the comparison with the USA then becomes too close for comfort. 

Fourthly there is perhaps some hint of disquiet due to the current dominance of Germany in the European Union both economically and politically which some Brits may find strange considering the situation around 70 years ago. Yet times change and countries change. Germany certainly has changed in that 70 years and today is an exemplar of a modern, liberal, democratic and open democracy which strongly upholds international values and freedoms. Indeed it perhaps is more cautious than many about its role on the world stage or any leadership due to its own turbulent history as it is only too aware of the consequences if its leadership goes wrong. 

Lastly Britain is an island nation and was centre of a global empire therefore tends to think as an island and globally. It is very internationalist in outlook because of its history and imperial legacy. 

The UK arguably is an empire of England in some ways. Wales was the earliest "colony" of England following the submission of the Welsh through King Edward I and his great Welsh Castles. Scotland was next beginning with the death of Queen Elizabeth I and succession of the Scottish king to the English throne as James I. Eventually the Act of Union was signed after the Scottish imperial misadventure which was the Darien Scheme which bankrupted Scotland causing them to have to be bailed out by England thereby leading to the Act of Union. Indeed the English imperial legacy is at the heart of the Irish Troubles due to mistreatment of the Catholics of Ulster since Elizabethan times and imposition and colonisation of Ulster with English and Scottish protestants. This led to distrust of Catholics back in England due to propaganda. Under King James I the crowns of England, Scotland and Ireland were united for the first time. Ulster was a pawn in the great battle for control of England in the Jacobite period after the fall of King James II. This religious strife continued until the 20th century eventually leading to Irish independence expect for the more Protestant dominated Northern Ireland. Thereby leading to the continuing troubles there until the Good Friday Agreement. However the BREXIT challenge could question the United Kingdom and its future as a country as there is a risk of break up particularly with Scotland and Northern Ireland.

As I keep saying we must not be complacent just because the status quo is currently that doesn't mean it will always be that.

Due to its imperial legacy Britain is a very multicultural and cosmopolitan country and welcoming to refugees and migrants from all over the world. Indeed every nation is a nation of migrants and refugees and Britain is a typical example of this fact. So turning our back on such groups is wrong and goes against our history as a human race. We are as a species are "Out of Africa" so we are all migrants really. Hence perhaps our yearning to look beyond just Europe and have relationships and trade all over the world. We also have a close bond with the USA and countries of the Commonwealth due to the legacy of the British Empire as well as being an inherently and geographically European country (we are Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Viking, Roman, Norman, French, Scottish, Dutch, German, etc). 

But because of the EU we feel or have the perception of being constrained in this currently hence the wish to break free and become a global nation again despite us always being this through our history and it never having gone away.  This despite many of the benefits of the European Union such as the single market being British inspired. Indeed it was Churchill who first called for a United States of Europe in gathering gloom of the Cold War as the Iron Curtain fell across Europe. After the Second World War it was the imperial mindset of Britain and Russia that carved up Europe with many of the countries in the East being given up to communist rule under Russia's Soviet Union and Stalin. At that time it was the dominance of the Big Three - Britain, America and Russia that ruled the world. The occupation of Germany and Japan by these powers also led to their rise to economic dominance in more recent years as well. They were so destroyed that they had to work hard and rebuild from scratch. It is worth remembering that much of today's global order was created as a legacy of the Second World War by Britain and America including the World Bank, NATO and the United Nations. 

But the perception of the British people regarding the EU appears to be of interference and rule by Brussels thereby leading to the fear that we are being ruled as a colony of the European collective which as outlined above seems too close for comfort to the United States of America - the colony that escaped from the British Empire. We don't like being ruled by others it seems!

I feel that these points are at the root of our philosophy as a nation and culture as well as perhaps informing our BREXIT decision. When negotiating and developing our new role in the world these points would be worth keeping in mind. They are at our core as a nation.

I think it is important to learn the lessons of our history but also take inspiration and joy from our history to build the future.

Alex

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ss NORMANDIE 1935 - 1942 IX

s s / te NORMANDIE starting from cold Owners: COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSATLANTIQUE BUILDERS: PENH Ă– ET, St. Nazaire, France   by Stephen Carey © , editing by Earl of Cruise   This document is almost exclusively about the engineering aspects of NORMANDIE , mainly on how to start her up from cold. If you are looking for photos of the passenger spaces, there is a plethora of them on the web, in Facebook groups - Admirers of the ss Normandie , ss Normandie photographic file , The French Ocean Liners / Les Paquebots Fran ç ais , ss Normandie , GREAT LINERS OF THE PAST & PRESENT , and others, Pinterest and in articles about NORMANDIE here in the blog, please see at the end of the article. Using "ss" for NORMANDIE is quite incorrect, as NORMANDIE was a Turbo Electric vessel and not a steamship, therefore NORMANDIE should be adressed as "te".   by Earl of Cruise te / ss NORMANDIE berthed in Le Havre, Gare Maritime May 29th, 1935 - colouring courtesy

Thank You 500,000 readers

HISTORY - The CUNARD - WHITE STAR Liner rms QUEEN ELIZABETH (1938-1972)

Over years, in my early youth, the QUEEN ELIZABETH was shaping my mind for the perfect ocean liner, despite having made my first experiences with a liner onboard the HANSEATIC (1), ex EMPRESS OF SCOTLAND, ex EMPRESS OF JAPAN. When leaning at the rail of HANSEATIC entering the port, my eyes where every where and I wished to by a camera, I took all in. And when seeing the QUEEN ELIZABETH with my own eyes, the nice behaving young boy turned into a tomboy, that my grandmére was no longer able to tame ... I did draw quite a lot of looks, back then. I found, while on research, this article and thought it interesting publishing in my blog: written and published by John Sheperd at liverpoolships.org editing and comments by Earl of Cruise I ( John Shepard ) joined the CUNARD LINE in March 1962 as an Assistant Purser and sailed the QUEEN ELIZABETH throughout that year, before transferring to the Liverpool-based CARINTHIA in November, where I remained as Crew Purser for the next five

Germany and HAPAG - A Journey through History

HAMBURG-AMERIKANISCHEPACKETFAHRT ACTIEN GESELLSCHAFT - HAPAG or HAMBURG AMERICA LINE is reflecting, as Germany, the LLOYD of Bremen, two times of rsing and two times of devasting downfall and a third rise. BORUSSIA , 1856, First Day Cover 1956 of Deutsche Bundespost - own collection Once Germany´s biggest shipping line HAPAG / HAMBURG-AMERIKANISCHE PACKETFAHRT ACTIEN GESELLSCHAFT-LLOYD, merged with it former old Hanseatic rival NORDDEUTSCHER LLOYD in 1970, to now HAPAG-LLOYD, had its peaks and downs, but rose each time on its own to new hights, without any state subsidies. As German mail subsidiaries did never cover the costs for purchasing or mainting the vessels ordered for the specific German mail lines.   by Earl of Cruise In this article I used most German Wikipedia links, as they proved to be mostly of better research quality, and surprisinf to me, some English lines and liners have only German written articles, for the others, English Wiki links are to find

HISTORY - Traveling with airliner LZ 129 HINDENBURG was the most luxurious airtravel

The real airliner LZ 129 HINDENBURG enabled the most luxurious airtravel for decades. Imagine, gliding through the air while the landscape or the sea below can be seen ... LZ 129 HINDENBURG marks the climax of airship construction. On May 6, 1937, the story of civilian airship ended in a tragedy. In Lakehurst, New Jersey, the largest flying object and has been with the similar sized LZ 130 GRAF ZEPPELIN II the most luxurious of all time. How this came about can be reconstructed logically, a series of fatal physics concatenations . The airship LZ 129 HINDENBURG marks the climax of airship construction. It was in its time the fastest and most exclusive traveling object between Europe and America. The challenges of the construction of the giant of the heaven were immense. by Earl of Cruise LZ 129 HINDENBURG, 1936, in Lakehurst - digital copy of a coloured cover photo, originally by Bill Schneider, published in Dan Grossman´s book ` ZEPPELIN HINDENBURG: AN ILLUSTRATED HI

HISTORY - PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY

The PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMANY was existing for "just" one hundred years and was in her heydays a backbone for the development of the US West. The PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY was founded April 18, 1848, as a joint stock company under the laws of the State of New York by a group of New York City merchants, William H. Aspinwall , Edwin Bartlett, Henry Chauncey, Mr. Alsop, G.G. Howland and S.S. Howland. These merchants had acquired the right to transport mail under contract from the United States Government from the Isthmusof Panama to California awarded in 1847 to one Arnold Harris. The company was sold 1938 last to AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES , existing only on the paper, was closed down in 1949.   by Earl of Cruise CALIFORNIA , PACIFIC MAIL's first ship - Source: Wikipedia   CALIFORNIAwas the first steamer built by the PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY and she was launched May 19, 1848. She sailed from New York for Panama, via Cape Horn, on October 6, 1848

HISTORY - ts / ss BREMEN and ts / ss EUROPA

Germany’s two luxury liners, BREMEN and EUROPA , have not only played an important part in their country’s mercantile revival, but have added also an immortal chapter to the history of transatlantic travel. Copy from Shipping Wonders of the World   From part 6 , published 17 March 1936 editing by Earl of Cruise ss / ts BREMEN in her early years - Source: Shipping Wonders of the World/Bundespresse Archiv The PRIDE OF A NATION - the NORDDEUTSCHER LLOYD quadruple-screw turbine express liner BREMEN . The keel of this ship was laid in June 1927. Her launch took place in August, 1928. In less than a year later, the Bremen made her first voyage to America, when she crossed the Atlantic from Cherbourg to New York in four days seventeen hours forty-two minutes, thus setting up a new record and gaining the coveted “Blue Riband”. During the passage the Bremen attained an average speed of 27.83 knots. ss / ts BREMEN in her early years - Source: W ikipedia For the populac

Ocean Liners in Movies or Films at Sea (updated Nov 2017)

For liners and the shipping companies movies and films had been a top marketing tool Movies or Films and liners at sea, had been intriguing me since I have read about in my youth in LUXUSLINER - BILDER EINER GROSSEN ZEIT by Lee Server ( THE GOLDEN AGE OF OCEAN LINERS ). But earlier, mot only since my first crossing, I was keen watching movies with liners in it, and disapointed, which was an understatement, when I realized the films have been made in a set ashore in some movie "factory". That was after my first crossing.   by Earl of Cruise an essay in progress `Sabrina´, Humphrey Bogart in the office, while LIBERTÉ is sailing out of New York harbor - screenshot Ocean liners, especially those of the luxury category, had been the location of dramas, love stories, thrillers, suspense and catastrophies sinde film was born, or nearly. In this list, the most descriptions are taken from Wikipedia, as I guess no one can expect having seen all these films ... otherwise I w

HISTORY - EUGENIO C. a masterpiece of Italian design and engineering

EUGENIO C., later EUGENIO COSTA, was a masterpiece of Italian design and is an example of beautifully integrated ship design. Her naval architect, Nicolò Costanzi, and her interior designer, Nino Zoncada, worked side by side, or hand in hand, to create a perfect balance and continuity between the vessel's interiors and the exterior profile. EUGENIO C. became a masterpiece of the 60s design and elegance. by Earl of Cruise Some readers had been asking for interior photographies ... here they are.   Eugenio C. Tourist Class A pool, looking aft into the wake line - own collection, copy from my LINEA  „ C ‟ broshure EUGENIO C. entered service a little more than 50 years ago in 1966. EUGENIO C. was a child of the swinging 60s, when we had the first jet setters, and still style and elegance. And travelling by jet in those days was still an expensive way to travel for few. I am not the only one wishing the same intent and sensibility would be a guide line for present shipown

Starting rms MAURETANIA from cold

rms MAURETANIA, 1907, Cold Starting CUNARD LINE Ltd., Builders: SWAN, HUNTER & WIGHAM RICHARDSON. Newcastle on Tyne by Stephen Carey, engineer, editing by Earl of Cruise rm s M AURETANIA © Stephen Carey 1 Overview of machinery spaces 1.1 Boiler rooms MAURETANIA is (or was) a quadruple screw Cunard liner fitted with 2 single-ended and 23 double-ended boilers, operating at 195lb/in2.   These boilers are arranged six in 3 boiler rooms (4,3   & 2; note that Cunard numbers forward to aft compared to White Star which numbers aft to forward), and five in No1 Boiler Room (the foremost one) where the fine lines of the ship only allow 2 abreast at the forward end of this boiler room. No1 Boiler Room also houses the two single ended boilers used for hotel services and auxiliary supplies in port.   The double-ended boilers are fired for transatlantic passages up to full speed and primarily used for main propulsion. Combustion air for the boilers is provided by forc