Skip to main content

Thank You 500,000 readers

New rules demand new solutions

Environmental regulations imposed on operators means that they must adopt new technology to comply with the new rules. In many cases the choice is LNG or low sulphor HFO or MDO.
by Earl of Cruise, based on THE NAVAL ARCHITECT, October 2016
Knud E. Hansen cruise vessel study HFO LNG
Cruise vessel design of KNUD E. HANSEN - courtesy KNUD E. HANSEN
Danish naval architects, KNUD E. HANSEN takes an informed look at the merits and demerits of both fuels, LNG and HFO, on a medium sized cruise liner. The naval architects have designed a medium sized cruiseship, ostensibly for a Greek operator to deploy in the Mediterranean. But KNUD E. HANSEN have made a comparison between the HFO fuelled version and its LNG variant.
According to KNUD E. HANSEN´s comparison, the operating expenses for the LNG version are lower, including the fuel consumption when the scrubber fuel (HFO) consumption is included in the calculation.
Scrubbers take out SOx from the exhaust when vessels are operating in Environmental Control Areas (ECA). These are f.e. 200sm off coast North America, the British Chanel, the North Sea, Baltic Sea and as well in Polar Regions. The Mediterranean is soon to follow, as well the Caribbean.
IMO regulation say the step will be in 2020, years ahead of the once planed schedule. Fuel has to be with at best 0,1% to a maximum of 0,5% sulphor.
LNG–fuelled ships will not need scrubbers to meet the SOx rules. On the other side all conventional fuelled ships need scrubbers to pass the new regulations. The LNG–fuelling is cutting back on both capital expenditue and operating costs. Further space is safed within the ship, or for the funnel design (dimensions). In addition, the LNG ships will not need a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to meet NOx rules, while HFO heating and purifying equipment would be unnecessary. HFO needs to be heated to around 60° to become "a fluid".
Furthermore, there would be no need for settling and daily tanks for the fuel and no waste chemicals. 
Gas carriers often take advantage of boil-off gas. LNG is stored in liquid form at -163°C and will emit small amounts of gas as the liquid warms. This boil-off gas is used for powering the main engine. But a cruise vessel can take advantage of this boil-off rate to cover the higher demands in electric load in the hotel section of the vessel.
In these days where safety is an issue as well as the availability of LNG in some parts of the world, the ability to switch fuels offers the cruise operator an `extra degree of redundancy´, explains KNUD E. HANSEN. The design company also explained that the LNG version prompted them to explore more innovative solutions in terms of engine room and consequently funnel location.
Such solutions, however, are no longer unique to the LNG fueled vessel.
Each new construction has to consider the new IMO machinery system redundancy requirements of the INO - SAFE RETURN to PORT RULE, e.g. two sperated machine rooms. Similar arrangements are now feasible for any diesel-electric configuration with only limited impact on construction costs.
And the final advantage according to KNUD E. HANSEN is that the bunkering process can take place with passengers onboard saving time in the operation of the ship. 
The list of disadvantages is shorter, but could ultimately prove more costly, at least in the short term.
Higher capital expenditure will be needed to build the vessel with all the safety features necessary for using a low flashpoint fuel. Safety will necessarily be a significant issue and the crew will need special training in the use of equipment and the handling of LNG. 
In addition, the LNG tank arrangement uses up a lot of technical space. Membrane tanks negate this effect compared to other types of tanks such as Type C tanks, while the LNG tank structure adds up a considerable amount of weight.
Knud E. Hansen cruise vessel design for LNG fuel
LNG fuelled cruise vessel design of KNUD E. HANSEN - courtesy KNUD E. HANSEN
Depicting the new configuration for LNG fuelled cruise ships
Strict bunkering procedures require the isolation of the main fire zone (MFZ) although there are `no official regulations regarding the bunkering procedure, only universally accepted guidance´, explains the design company.
Bunkering LNG itself could also prove a difficulty in some parts of the world.  
LNG supply and infrastructure  remains underdeveloped. Meanwhile, a lack of experience in the design and operation of LNG powered cruise vessels means that investors are reluctant to risk being the first to make the investment. Tank sizing was based on three operational scenarios. In all three of them there is the assumption that the energy requirements of the vessel can be covered relying solely on either LNG or HFO.
Technical Particulars - Reference vessel
Loa
250m
Breadth
034m
Depth
009.5m
Design draught
007m
Service Speed
18 Kn
Persons onboard
2650 (passenger and crew)
Propulsion
podded electric thrusters
LNG Version

6 medium speed dual fuel engines.
LNG as main fuel, in combination with MDO for pilot fuel and compliance with SRtP rules.
Membrane type of tank for LNG storage HFO Version 6 medium speed diesel generators HFO in all normal operating conditions Scrubbers and possible SCR/EGR
KNUD E. HANSEN research results are as follows:
Scenario 1
includes five day cruises, with four trips per month and bunkering intervals at 14 days
Scenario 2
has 2.5 trips a month with 12-day cruises and bunkering intervals set at six-12 days
Scenario 3
includes a 21-day transatlantic cruise, 1.4 trips per month, and bunkering intervals of every 10 days.
The outcome of this research was that an LNG tank of 2,000m³, would be sufficient to cover the vessel’s needs for the first 2 scenarios, while for the third one, a future retrofit and potential addition of a tank could be an option.
HFO fuelled design study of Knud E. Hansen
HFO fuelled cruise vessel design of KNUD E. HANSEN - courtesy KNUD E. HANSEN
Depicting the "classic" configuration for modern day cruise vessels
The pilot fuel has been calculated as the equivalent to 5% of the LNG thermal capacity that is onboard. Additional MDO to comply with the safe return to port rules and for redundancy purposes would also need to be taken into account.
For the two versions of the cruiseship design there are potentially small changes in the dimensions of the vessels midship section. The vessel will include two engine rooms located fore and aft of the LNG tanks. A reduction on the amount of equipment that will be required in the LNG version offers the possibility of rearranging the machinery area to gain space.
This will also necessitate changes to the crew cabins location, the crew public spaces and the provisions area. A change in the vessel’s profile due to double funnels, located on the centreline of the machine room will also mean changes to the external open deck arrangement and facilities that would be combined with the two funnels. 
On the LNG version the membrane tanks are preferred as these types of tank use the available space more efficiently.
According to the naval architect: "80% of the vessel’s inner hull volume in the certain compartment that will accommodate the membrane, will constitute the membrane.  There is a difference of 30-40% in the usable volume of the area where the tank is located between Type C and membrane tanks."
In addition, there is "no minimum filling limit in membrane tanks (no thermal stresses restrictions as in type C tanks)".
Irrespective of the type of tanks, cruiseships can turn the potential problem of boil off gas to an advantage through the powering of the hotel areas. "Managing the boil-off gas on a cruise vessel is not considered a major issue, due to the extended hotel load," says  KNUD E. HANSEN. "Often, boil-off gas is produced on purpose to cover the needs in electrical load."
When this is not the case, the `excess´ boil-off gas can be used in various ways, including the innovative combination of an LNG fuelled vessel with significant battery storage onboard. The boil-off gas can be used for battery charging via DC electric  storage, increasing the LNG efficiency onboard while offering a further more eco-friendly solution. 
The excess gas can also be used to fuel the auxiliary boiler and produce steam for various purposes or to fuel the incinerator. Other solutions, including gas combustion units, which just waste the energy, and reliquefaction units, are costly and apply mostly to other, more specialised types of vessel such as gas carriers. These are not neccessary for cruise vessels.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ss NORMANDIE 1935 - 1942 IX

s s / te NORMANDIE starting from cold Owners: COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSATLANTIQUE BUILDERS: PENH Ö ET, St. Nazaire, France   by Stephen Carey © , editing by Earl of Cruise   This document is almost exclusively about the engineering aspects of NORMANDIE , mainly on how to start her up from cold. If you are looking for photos of the passenger spaces, there is a plethora of them on the web, in Facebook groups - Admirers of the ss Normandie , ss Normandie photographic file , The French Ocean Liners / Les Paquebots Fran ç ais , ss Normandie , GREAT LINERS OF THE PAST & PRESENT , and others, Pinterest and in articles about NORMANDIE here in the blog, please see at the end of the article. Using "ss" for NORMANDIE is quite incorrect, as NORMANDIE was a Turbo Electric vessel and not a steamship, therefore NORMANDIE should be adressed as "te".   by Earl of Cruise te / ss NORMANDIE berthed in Le Havre, Gare Maritime May 29th, 1935 - colouring courtesy

Thank You 500,000 readers

HISTORY - PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY

The PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMANY was existing for "just" one hundred years and was in her heydays a backbone for the development of the US West. The PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY was founded April 18, 1848, as a joint stock company under the laws of the State of New York by a group of New York City merchants, William H. Aspinwall , Edwin Bartlett, Henry Chauncey, Mr. Alsop, G.G. Howland and S.S. Howland. These merchants had acquired the right to transport mail under contract from the United States Government from the Isthmusof Panama to California awarded in 1847 to one Arnold Harris. The company was sold 1938 last to AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES , existing only on the paper, was closed down in 1949.   by Earl of Cruise CALIFORNIA , PACIFIC MAIL's first ship - Source: Wikipedia   CALIFORNIAwas the first steamer built by the PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY and she was launched May 19, 1848. She sailed from New York for Panama, via Cape Horn, on October 6, 1848

HISTORY - Traveling with airliner LZ 129 HINDENBURG was the most luxurious airtravel

The real airliner LZ 129 HINDENBURG enabled the most luxurious airtravel for decades. Imagine, gliding through the air while the landscape or the sea below can be seen ... LZ 129 HINDENBURG marks the climax of airship construction. On May 6, 1937, the story of civilian airship ended in a tragedy. In Lakehurst, New Jersey, the largest flying object and has been with the similar sized LZ 130 GRAF ZEPPELIN II the most luxurious of all time. How this came about can be reconstructed logically, a series of fatal physics concatenations . The airship LZ 129 HINDENBURG marks the climax of airship construction. It was in its time the fastest and most exclusive traveling object between Europe and America. The challenges of the construction of the giant of the heaven were immense. by Earl of Cruise LZ 129 HINDENBURG, 1936, in Lakehurst - digital copy of a coloured cover photo, originally by Bill Schneider, published in Dan Grossman´s book ` ZEPPELIN HINDENBURG: AN ILLUSTRATED HI

HISTORY - ts / ss BREMEN and ts / ss EUROPA

Germany’s two luxury liners, BREMEN and EUROPA , have not only played an important part in their country’s mercantile revival, but have added also an immortal chapter to the history of transatlantic travel. Copy from Shipping Wonders of the World   From part 6 , published 17 March 1936 editing by Earl of Cruise ss / ts BREMEN in her early years - Source: Shipping Wonders of the World/Bundespresse Archiv The PRIDE OF A NATION - the NORDDEUTSCHER LLOYD quadruple-screw turbine express liner BREMEN . The keel of this ship was laid in June 1927. Her launch took place in August, 1928. In less than a year later, the Bremen made her first voyage to America, when she crossed the Atlantic from Cherbourg to New York in four days seventeen hours forty-two minutes, thus setting up a new record and gaining the coveted “Blue Riband”. During the passage the Bremen attained an average speed of 27.83 knots. ss / ts BREMEN in her early years - Source: W ikipedia For the populac

HISTORY - The CUNARD - WHITE STAR Liner rms QUEEN ELIZABETH (1938-1972)

Over years, in my early youth, the QUEEN ELIZABETH was shaping my mind for the perfect ocean liner, despite having made my first experiences with a liner onboard the HANSEATIC (1), ex EMPRESS OF SCOTLAND, ex EMPRESS OF JAPAN. When leaning at the rail of HANSEATIC entering the port, my eyes where every where and I wished to by a camera, I took all in. And when seeing the QUEEN ELIZABETH with my own eyes, the nice behaving young boy turned into a tomboy, that my grandmére was no longer able to tame ... I did draw quite a lot of looks, back then. I found, while on research, this article and thought it interesting publishing in my blog: written and published by John Sheperd at liverpoolships.org editing and comments by Earl of Cruise I ( John Shepard ) joined the CUNARD LINE in March 1962 as an Assistant Purser and sailed the QUEEN ELIZABETH throughout that year, before transferring to the Liverpool-based CARINTHIA in November, where I remained as Crew Purser for the next five

Ocean Liners in Movies or Films at Sea (updated Nov 2017)

For liners and the shipping companies movies and films had been a top marketing tool Movies or Films and liners at sea, had been intriguing me since I have read about in my youth in LUXUSLINER - BILDER EINER GROSSEN ZEIT by Lee Server ( THE GOLDEN AGE OF OCEAN LINERS ). But earlier, mot only since my first crossing, I was keen watching movies with liners in it, and disapointed, which was an understatement, when I realized the films have been made in a set ashore in some movie "factory". That was after my first crossing.   by Earl of Cruise an essay in progress `Sabrina´, Humphrey Bogart in the office, while LIBERTÉ is sailing out of New York harbor - screenshot Ocean liners, especially those of the luxury category, had been the location of dramas, love stories, thrillers, suspense and catastrophies sinde film was born, or nearly. In this list, the most descriptions are taken from Wikipedia, as I guess no one can expect having seen all these films ... otherwise I w

Germany and HAPAG - A Journey through History

HAMBURG-AMERIKANISCHEPACKETFAHRT ACTIEN GESELLSCHAFT - HAPAG or HAMBURG AMERICA LINE is reflecting, as Germany, the LLOYD of Bremen, two times of rsing and two times of devasting downfall and a third rise. BORUSSIA , 1856, First Day Cover 1956 of Deutsche Bundespost - own collection Once Germany´s biggest shipping line HAPAG / HAMBURG-AMERIKANISCHE PACKETFAHRT ACTIEN GESELLSCHAFT-LLOYD, merged with it former old Hanseatic rival NORDDEUTSCHER LLOYD in 1970, to now HAPAG-LLOYD, had its peaks and downs, but rose each time on its own to new hights, without any state subsidies. As German mail subsidiaries did never cover the costs for purchasing or mainting the vessels ordered for the specific German mail lines.   by Earl of Cruise In this article I used most German Wikipedia links, as they proved to be mostly of better research quality, and surprisinf to me, some English lines and liners have only German written articles, for the others, English Wiki links are to find

HISTORY - RHEINGOLD the German luxury day express train

Between May 1928 and August 1939 the luxury day express train RHEINGOLD operated between Hoek van Holland and Basel as a FFD Pullman train of DEUTSCHE REICHSBAHN GESELLSCHAFT (DRG) and MITROPA. The name was mystic and elitarian. by Earl of Cruise   RHEINGOLD, the name of the most luxurious train ever of Germany - detail, own photo On May 15th, 1928 the luxury express train RHEINGOLD started for the first time, connecting Hoek von Holland, Netherlands, and Amsterdamn with Basel, Suisse. Name giving was the legendary treasure of the Nibelungen. This special service for most international travelers was an immidiate success. Advertisment for the RHEINGOLD created by Frank Newbould - collection Earl of Cruise For the most travelers in the RHEINGOLD meant the voyage in the luxury train more than being transported in high comfort. From their soft armchairs they could watch the pitoresque Rhine landscape, with wine villages, vine-growing slopes, forteresses and castles, and the Lo

Starting rms TITANIC from cold

rms TITANIC, 1911, Cold Starting WHITES STAR LINE Ltd., Builders: HALAND & WOLFF, Belfast by Stephen Carey, engineer, editing by Earl of Cruise rms TITANIC, 1911 © Stephen Carey   Table of Contents 1     Overview of machinery spaces 1.1        Boiler rooms 1.2        Coal bunkers 1.3        Propulsion engines 1.4        Electrical power generation 1.4.1            Main generating sets 1.4.2            Emergency generating sets 2     Lighting up the boilers 2.1        Steam line redundancy 3     Starting the generators 3.1        Auxiliary seawater pump and condenser 3.2        Starting an emergency generator 3.3        Starting the main generators 4     Starting main engines 4.1        Main seawater pumps 4.2        Main air pumps (dual system) 4.3        Main Generator exhaust change over 4.4        Main engines 5     The Feedwater and Condensate system 5.1        Surface feed heater 5.2        Contact feed heater 5.3        Boiler Feed Pumps 6